Uterine transposition versus uterine ventrofixation before radiotherapy as a fertility sparing option in young women with pelvic malignancies: Systematic review of the literature and dose simulation.

BACKGROUND: (Chemo)radiation may be a required treatment in young women with pelvic malignancies. Irradiation may result in ovarian and uterine failure, compromising the fertility of those patients. While ovarian transposition is an established method to move the ovaries away from the irradiation field, similar surgical procedures regarding the uterus remain investigational. The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic review of the literature on uterine displacement techniques (ventrofixation/transposition) and to simulate the radiation dose received by the uterus in different heights place after the procedures. METHODS: The systematic review was performed according PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and EMBASE were queried to identify included study until March 2023. Retrospectively, a dosimetric study was also performed and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) radiotherapy treatment plans were calculated, to assess the dose received by the uterus according to hypothetical different displacement positions taking the case of irradiation for rectal or anal cancer as model. RESULTS: A total of 187 studies were included, after the screening 9 studies were selected for synthesis. Data from the dose simulation revealed that the transposition approach was the most protective with a maximum dose of about 3 and 8 Gy for anal and rectal cancer respectively. None of the simulated ventrofixation positions received a Dmean surpassing 14 Gy. CONCLUSION: According to the literature review and the simulation results of the present study we may conclude are feasible and safe as fertility sparing approach in young rectal/anal cancer patients.

Safety of fertility-sparing surgery in young women with stage I endometrioid epithelial and mucinous ovarian cancer: A population-based analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the safety of fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in stage I endometrioid epithelial cancer (EEOC) and mucinous ovarian cancer (MOC). METHODS: A retrospective case‒controlled study was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, focusing on stage I EEOC and MOC between 2000 and 2016. The effects of FSS on overall survival (OS) were compared using log-rank tests. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to control for confounders. RESULTS: The study identified 970 patients with FIGO stage I EEOC and 810 with stage I MOC. Of these patients, 116 (12.0%) EEOC and 268 (33.1%) MOC patients underwent fertility-sparing surgery. The results showed that patients with G3 EEOC had a worse 5-year OS than patients with G1 EEOC (96.1% vs. 90.1%, p = 0.020). IC stage MOC patients had a worse prognosis than IA and IB stage patients (94.9% vs. 88.7%, p = 0.001). FSS did not significantly affect the 5-year OS of patients with EEOC (94.8% vs. 95.4%, p = 0.687) or MOC (95.9% vs. 92.3%, p = 0.071). Further subgroup analysis according to tumor stage and histological grade did not show a worse OS with FSS in stage I EEOC or MOC patients, even with high-risk types such as G3 histology and IC phase. In a multivariable analysis, the application of FSS was not associated with inferior OS in EEOC or MOC. CONCLUSIONS: FSS for patients with stage I EEOC or MOC does not lead to worse outcomes than radical surgery, making it a viable option for young patients with early-stage disease wishing to preserve fertility.

Total Margin Control Is Superior to Traditional Margin Assessment for Treatment of Low-Stage Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Penile cancer is rare, with significant morbidity and limited literature assessing utility of peripheral and deep en face margin assessment (PDEMA) vs traditional margin assessment (vertical sections) on treatment outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a 32-year retrospective multicenter cohort study at 3 academic tertiary care centers. The cohort consisted of 189 patients with histologic diagnosis of in situ or T1a cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the penis at Brigham and Women's, Massachusetts General Hospital (1988-2020), and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (1995-2020) treated with PDEMA surgical excision, excision/circumcision, or penectomy/glansectomy. Local recurrence, metastasis, and disease-specific death were assessed via multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 189 patients. Median age at diagnosis was 62 years. Median tumor diameter was 1.3 cm. The following outcomes of interest occurred: 30 local recurrences, 13 metastases, and 5 disease-specific deaths. Primary tumors were excised with PDEMA (N = 30), excision/circumcision (N = 110), or penectomy/glansectomy (N = 49). Of patients treated with traditional margin assessment (non-PDEMA), 12% had narrow or positive margins. Five-year proportions were as follows with respect to local recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and disease-specific survival/progression-free survival, respectively: 100%, 100%, and 100% following PDEMA; 82%, 96%, and 99% following excision/circumcision; 83%, 91%, and 95% following penectomy/glansectomy. A limitation is that this multi-institutional cohort study was not externally validated. CONCLUSIONS: Initial results are encouraging that PDEMA surgical management effectively controls early-stage penile squamous cell carcinoma.

SAVE Testis-sparing score: a multicenter retrospective study of a novel predictive tool for quantifying testicular tumors.

BACKGROUND: Testis-sparing surgery (TSS) is a safe treatment for patients with benign testicular tumors. Presently, assessments for evaluating the suitability of TSS are poorly standardized, partially because testicular anatomical elements cannot be quantitatively described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors developed a scoring method known as the SAVE testis-sparing score based on four critical and accessible anatomical features of a testicular tumor. The SAVE score ranges from 0 to 8 and is divided into four risk classes ( low , medium , high , and extremely high ) to evaluate the feasibility of TSS, wherein low-risk indicates high feasibility and vice versa. This study included 444 testicular tumor patients from eight centers. Among them, 216 patients (model group: 151 patients, validation group: 65 patients) were included in the modeling analysis, and the other 228 patients from children's centers were included in the proportion analysis. Using retrospective data, patient characteristics associated with surgical methods were identified. Furthermore, a multivariate logistic regression model was built quantify the associations between these characteristics and the surgery method. The receiver operator characteristic curve was used to evaluate the classification efficiency of SAVE. RESULTS: The SAVE testis-sparing score includes size (tumor size as maximal diameter), available testicular tissue volume, volume ratio of the tumor to the testis, and the exophytic / endophytic properties of the tumor. The SAVE scoring system accurately classified the suitability of TSS based on the complexity of benign testicular tumors. CONCLUSION: The SAVE score is a reproducible and robust tool for quantitatively describing the anatomical characteristics of benign testicular tumors and guide the preoperative evaluation of TSS.

[Organ-preserving treatment as the most important option in the treatment of primary penile cancer]. / Organerhaltende Therapie als wichtigste Option in der Behandlung des Primärtumors des Peniskarzinoms.

The treatment of patients with penile cancer presents a significant challenge for therapists and patients alike. In this context, the focus must not only be on surgical techniques but rather on patient education and collaborative treatment planning. Consistent information about potential organ preservation and its consequences is essential. Following clinical examination and histological confirmation of the diagnosis, an organ-preserving and stage-adapted surgical procedure should be used in almost all cases. Intraoperatively, the aim should be to achieve tumour-free surgical margins through rapid pathological examination. Psycho-oncological support should be offered to all patients. Centralisation of treatment appears highly desirable for Germany, considering the excellent outcomes observed in English and Dutch centres. Until this has been achieved, following the valuable experience of the "Second Opinion Network for Testicular Tumours", the Second Opinion platform "eKonsil Urologie" (https://www.ekonsil.org) can be used as a reference.

Organ-Sparing Surgery for Testicular Germ Cell Tumors: A Current Perspective.

Background and Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the oncological and functional outcomes of organ-sparing surgery for testicular germ cell tumors, a procedure that seeks to strike a balance between effective cancer control and organ preservation, in the treatment of testicular tumors. We aimed to discuss the surgical technique and complications, and determine the appropriate candidate selection for this approach. Material and Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies on organ-sparing surgery for testicular tumors. Various databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, were used. Studies reporting on surgical techniques, complications, and oncologic and functional outcomes were included for analysis. Results: Current evidence suggests that organ-sparing surgery for testicular germ cell tumors can be considered a safe and efficacious alternative to radical orchiectomy. The procedure is associated with adequate oncological control, as indicated by low recurrence rates and low complication rates. Endocrine testicular function can be preserved in around 80-90% of patients and paternity can be achieved in approximately half of the patients. Candidate selection for this surgery is typically based on the following criteria: pre-surgery normal levels of testosterone and luteinizing hormone, synchronous or metachronous bilateral tumors, tumor in a solitary testis, and tumor size less than 50% of the testis. Conclusions: Organ-sparing surgery for testicular germ cell tumors offers a promising approach that balances oncological control and preservation of testicular function. Further research, including large-scale prospective studies and long-term follow-ups, is warranted to validate the effectiveness and durability of organ-sparing surgery and to identify optimal patient selection criteria.

Evaluating Pareto optimal tradeoffs for hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiotherapy with knowledge-based multicriteria optimization.

The goal of this study is to investigate the Pareto optimal tradeoffs between target coverage and hippocampal sparing using knowledge-based multicriteria optimization (MCO). Ten prior clinical cases were selected that were treated with hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) using VMAT. A new, balanced plan was generated for each case using an in-house RapidPlan model in the Eclipse V16.1 treatment planning system. The MCO decision support tool was used to create 4 Pareto optimal plans. The Pareto optimal plans were created using PTV Dmin and hippocampus Dmax as tradeoff criteria. The tradeoff plans were generated for each patient by adjusting PTV Dmin from the value achieved by the corresponding balanced plan in fixed intervals as follows: -4 Gy, -2 Gy, +2 Gy, and +4 Gy. All plans were normalized so that 95% of the PTV was covered by the prescription dose. A 1-way ANOVA, with Geisser-Greenhouse correction, was used for statistical analysis. When evaluating the achieved PTV Dmin and D98%, the results showed the dose to the hippocampus decreased as coverage lowered and in comparison, D98% was higher when the PTV coverage was increased. When comparing multiple tradeoffs, the p-value for PTV D98% was 0.0026, and the p-values for PTV D2%, PTV Dmin, Hippocampus Dmax, Dmin, and Dmean were all less than 0.0001, indicating that the tradeoff plans achieved statistically significant differences. The results also showed that Pareto optimal plans failed to reduce hippocampal dose beyond a certain point, indicating more limited achievability of the MCO-navigated plans than the interface suggested. This study presents valuable data for planning results for HA-WBRT using MCO. MCO has shown to be mostly effective in adjusting the tradeoff between PTV coverage and hippocampal dose.

[Anal fistulas: Sparing the sphincter]. / Fistules anales, épargner le sphincter.

ANAL FISTULAS: SPARING THE SPHINCTER. Fistulotomy is the most used treatment for anal fistula. It is very effective with a cure rate of over 95% but carries a risk of incontinence. This has led to the development of various sphincter sparing techniques. The injection of biological glue or paste and the insertion of a plug have disappointing results and are expensive. The rectal advancement flap is still practised because of its cure rate of around 75% but it may result in some incontinence. Intersphincteric ligation of the fistula track and laser treatment are widely practised in France with cure rates between 60 and 70%. Video-assisted anal fistula treatment as well as injections of adipose tissue, stromal vascular fraction, platelet-enriched plasma and/or mesenchymal stem cells are emerging techniques for which even better results are expected.

FISTULES ANALES, ÉPARGNER LE SPHINCTER. La fistulotomie est le traitement le plus souvent utilisé dans la fistule anale. Elle est très efficace, avec un taux de guérison supérieur à 95 %, mais expose à un risque d'incontinence. Cela a conduit au développement de diverses techniques d'épargne sphinctérienne. L'injection de colle ou de pâte biologique ainsi que la mise en place d'un plug ont des résultats finalement décevants et un coût élevé. Le lambeau rectal d'avancement est encore pratiqué en raison de son taux de guérison aux alentours de 75 %, mais il peut se solder par quelques troubles séquellaires de la continence. La ligature intersphinctérienne du trajet fistuleux et le laser sont largement pratiqués en France, avec des taux de guérison oscillant entre 60 et 70 %. Le traitement vidéo-assisté du trajet fistuleux ainsi que les injections périfistuleuses de tissu adipeux, de fraction vasculaire stromale, de plasma enrichi en plaquettes et/ou de cellules souches mésenchymateuses sont des techniques émergentes dont on espère de meilleurs résultats encore.

Pelvic Organ Preservation in Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Less Is More.

Radical cystectomy (RC) is a treatment option for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) but is associated with high morbidity and a negative impact on quality of life. Reproductive or pelvic organ-sparing cystectomy (ROSC) techniques have emerged as a potential strategy to mitigate some potential effects of standard RC. Here we discuss current knowledge regarding oncological, functional, and sexual function outcomes associated with ROSC and their applicability in NMIBC. These outcomes can be used to make informed clinical decisions regarding cystectomy technique in appropriately staged and selected patients with NMIBC. PATIENT SUMMARY: We reviewed results for bladder cancer control, urinary function, and sexual function after removal of the bladder with and without techniques to spare reproductive or pelvic organs. We found evidence of better sexual function outcomes with a sparing approach without compromise of cancer control. Further studies are needed to assess urinary function and pelvic floor-related outcomes.

Surgical management of prepubertal testicular tumors: A 30-year study in our institution.

OBJECTIVES: The 2021 European Association of Urology-European Society for Paediatric Urology guidelines on Pediatric Urology recommended testis-sparing surgery (TSS) as the primary approach to treat prepubertal testicular tumors exhibiting favorable preoperative ultrasound diagnoses. However, prepubertal testicular tumors are rare and clinical data regarding them is limited. Here, we analyzed the surgical management of prepubertal testicular tumors based on cases observed over approximately 30 years. METHODS: Data were retrospectively reviewed from medical records of consecutive patients aged <14 years with testicular tumors who received treatment at our institution between 1987 and 2020. We compared patients by their clinical characteristics, namely, those who underwent TSS versus radical orchiectomy (RO) and those who received surgery in 2005 onward versus prior to 2005. RESULTS: We identified 17 patients, with a median age at surgery of 3.2 years (range 0.6-14.0) and a median tumor size of 15 mm (range 6-67). The tumor size was significantly smaller in patients who underwent TSS than in those who underwent RO (p = 0.007). Patients treated in 2005 onward were more likely to undergo TSS than those treated prior to 2005 (71% vs. 10%, respectively), without significant differences in tumor size or the rate of preoperative ultrasound. No TSS cases required conversion to RO. CONCLUSIONS: Recent improvements in ultrasound imaging technology allow for more accurate clinical diagnosis. Therefore, the indications of TSS for prepubertal testicular tumors can be judged based not only on the tumor size but also on the diagnosis of benign tumors by preoperative ultrasound.

Practice Patterns Regarding Female Reproductive Organ-Sparing and Nerve-Sparing Radical Cystectomy Among Urologic Oncologists in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Female reproductive organ-sparing (ROS) and nerve-sparing radical cystectomy (RC) techniques have been shown to be oncologically safe and to improve sexual function outcomes among select patients with organ-confined disease. We sought to characterize practice patterns regarding female ROS and nerve-sparing RC among US urologists. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of members of the Society of Urologic Oncology to assess provider-reported frequency of ROS and nerve-sparing RC in premenopausal and postmenopausal patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer that failed intravesical therapy or clinically localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer. RESULTS: Among 101 urologists, 80 (79.2%) reported that they routinely resect the uterus/cervix, 68 (67.3%) the neurovascular bundle, 49 (48.5%) the ovaries, and 19 (18.8%) a portion of the vagina when performing RC in premenopausal patients with organ-confined disease. When asked about changes to approach in postmenopausal patients, 71 participants (70.3%) reported that they were less likely to spare the uterus/cervix, 44 (43.6%) were less likely to spare the neurovascular bundle, 70 (69.3%) were less likely to spare the ovaries, and 23 (22.8%) were less likely to spare a portion of the vagina. CONCLUSION: We identified significant gaps in adoption of female ROS and nerve-sparing RC techniques for patients with organ-confined disease, despite evidence that ROS and nerve-sparing techniques are oncologically safe and can optimize functional outcomes in select patients. Future efforts should improve provider training in and education about ROS and nerve-sparing RC to improve postoperative outcomes among female patients.

Challenges in Organ-sparing Surgery for Penile Cancer: What Are the Limits?

Organ-sparing surgery (OSS) is endorsed by the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines as the preferred treatment for distal primary penile cancer. The recommendation states that OSS should be used whenever possible, without exactly defining what constitutes "possible". This recommendation is based on findings showing that this approach has no detrimental impact on survival. At the same time, OSS results in preservation of quality of life (QoL) and of various functions of the penis. However, while narrow tumor-free margins (>1 mm) are deemed oncologically safe, there is a higher risk of local recurrence. Recent data have emerged that question the dogma that a local recurrence does not impact survival outcomes. In this mini review, we highlight areas of discrepancy in current guidelines and describe challenges for a surgical approach with a delicate balance between oncological safety on the one hand and maximal preservation of QoL and penile functions on the other. PATIENT SUMMARY: Organ-sparing surgery has been recommended as the preferred treatment for primary cancer of the penis, as quality of life and sexual function are maximally preserved. In this review we identify challenges and limitations in routinely adopting this approach.

The Legacy of RTOG/NRG Protocols in Shaping Current Bladder Preservation Therapy in North America.

For muscle-invasive bladder cancer, the historical, gold standard treatment was radical cystectomy. However, the notion of organ preservation using trimodality therapy (TMT, consisting of maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor followed by chemoradiation) has been established as a viable treatment alternative to complete removal of the bladder. Despite the lack of direct head-to-head randomized comparisons of TMT to radical cystectomy, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)/NRG has spearheaded the use of radiation therapy as part of bladder preservation for years, with prospective data demonstrating similar long-term clinical outcomes to cystectomy series, particularly with contemporary treatment. We summarize these trials and discuss the evolution of bladder preservation throughout the decades, culminating in our current TMT protocols. We further discuss the future of organ-preservation therapy in MIBC, with continued improvement in radiation techniques, incorporation of novel therapies, and personalization of treatment to optimize benefit for bladder cancer patients.

Patterns of failure in pediatric medulloblastoma and implications for hippocampal sparing.

BACKGROUND: Hippocampal avoidance (HA) has been shown to preserve cognitive function in adult patients with cancer treated with whole-brain radiation therapy for brain metastases. However, the feasibility of HA in pediatric patients with brain tumors has not been explored because of concerns of increased risk of relapse in the peri-hippocampal region. Our aim was to determine patterns of recurrence and incidence of peri-hippocampal relapse in pediatric patients with medulloblastoma (MB). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified pediatric patients with MB treated with protons between 2002 and 2016 and who had recurrent disease. To estimate the risk of peri-hippocampal recurrence, three hippocampal zones (HZs) were delineated corresponding to ≤5 mm (HZ-1), 6 to 10 mm (HZ-2), and >10 mm (HZ-3) distance of the recurrence from the contoured hippocampi. To determine the feasibility of HA, three standard-risk patients with MB were planned using either volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients developed a recurrence at a median of 1.6 years. Of the 25 patients who had magnetic resonance imaging of the recurrence, no patients failed within the hippocampus and only two patients failed within HZ-1. The crude incidence of peri-hippocampal failure was 8%. Both HA-VMAT and HA-IMPT plans were associated with significantly reduced mean dose to the hippocampi (p < .05). HA-VMAT and HA-IMPT plans were associated with decreased percentage of the third and lateral ventricles receiving the prescription craniospinal dose of 23.4 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Peri-hippocampal failures are uncommon in pediatric patients with MB. Hippocampal avoidance should be evaluated in a prospective cohort of pediatric patients with MB. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: In this study, the patterns of disease recurrence in patients with a pediatric brain tumor known as medulloblastoma treated with proton radiotherapy were examined. The majority of failures occur outside of an important structure related to memory formation called the hippocampus. Hippocampal sparing radiation plans using proton radiotherapy were generated and showed that dose to the hippocampus was able to be significantly reduced. The study provides the rationale to explore hippocampal sparing in pediatric medulloblastoma in a prospective clinical trial.

[Bladder-sparing trimodal therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer]. / Stratégie de préservation vésicale basée sur le traitement trimodal : quelle place dans la prise en charge du carcinome infiltrant de la vessie ?

Organ-sparing strategies in the management of local or locally advanced cancers meet a dual objective: tumor control and preservation of the function of the involved organ. Given the morbidity and mortality of cystectomy and its impact on quality of life and bladder function, bladder-sparing strategies have emerged for the management of urothelial muscle invasive bladder cancer, mostly through trimodal treatment, which consists in maximal trans-urethral resection of bladder tumor, followed by chemo-radiotherapy. This review presents the modalities of trimodal treatment, before exposing the advantages and limitations of this strategy compared to cystectomy among operable patients. Despite the absence of comparative data from randomized trials, the two approaches seem to provide similar oncological results among appropriately selected patients. In modern series, the rate of salvage cystectomy is approximately 15% at 5 years; this delayed cystectomy does not seem to be associated with greater morbidity and mortality as compared to upfront cystectomy. Emphasis is placed in the review on quality of life data of these two approaches. In order to optimize the selection of patients eligible to trimodal therapy, the classical predictive factors of response to radio(chemo)therapy are critically analyzed, with the perspective of innovative molecular biomarkers. Finally, a close multidisciplinary collaboration is needed for the choice and the execution of the therapeutic strategy, and the patient should be fully involved in the decision-making process.

Robotic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy shows better short-term advantages: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery may be advantageous for complex surgery. We aimed to compare the intraoperative and postoperative short-term outcomes of spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (SPSHL) during robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy. METHODS: From July 2016 to December 2020, the clinicopathological data of 115 patients who underwent robotic total gastrectomy combined with robotic SPSHL (RSPSHL) and 697 patients who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy combined with laparoscopic SPSHL (LSPSHL) were retrospectively analyzed. A 1:2 ratio propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the differences between the two groups to compare their outcomes. The Generic Error Rating Tool was used to evaluate the technical performance. RESULTS: After PSM, the baseline preoperative characteristics of the 115 patients in the RSPSHL and 230 patients in the LSPSHL groups were balanced. The dissection time of the region of the splenic artery trunk (5.4 ± 1.9 min vs. 7.8 ± 3.6 min, P < 0.001), the estimated blood loss during SPSHL (9.6 ± 4.8 ml vs. 14.9 ± 7.8 ml, P < 0.001), and the average number of intraoperative technical errors during SPSHL (15.1 ± 3.4 times/case vs. 20.7 ± 4.3 times/case, P < 0.001) were significantly lower in the RSPSHL group than in the LSPSHL group. The RSPSHL group showed higher dissection rates of No. 10 (78.3% vs. 70.0%, P = 0.104) and No. 11d (54.8% vs. 40.4%, P = 0.012) lymph nodes and significantly improved postoperative recovery results in terms of times to ambulation, first flatus, and first intake (P < 0.05). The splenectomy rates of the two groups were similar (1.7% vs. 0.4%, P = 0.539), and there was no significant difference in morbidity and mortality within postoperative 30 days (13.0% vs. 15.2%, P = 0.589). CONCLUSION: Compared to LSPSHL, RSPSHL has more advantages in terms of surgical qualities and postoperative recovery process with similar morbidity and mortality. For complex SPSHL, robotic surgery may be a better choice.

Bladder preservation in older adults with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A retrospective study with concurrent chemotherapy and twice-daily hypofractionated radiotherapy schedule.

INTRODUCTION: Bladder cancer occurs mainly in older adults and surgery is not always possible when there are geriatric conditions and comorbidities. Trimodal treatment (TMT) combining trans-urethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) followed by concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) would be a curative alternative in such patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients 75 years of age and older with non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) treated with TMT by Georges Pompidou European Hospital team were retrospectively analysed. Induction CRT combined hypofractionated twice-daily radiotherapy targeting bladder and pelvis to a total dose of 24 Gy (Gy) with concurrent platinum salt and 5-fluorouracil. Consolidation CRT to a total dose of 44 Gy was proposed to patients with biopsy-proven complete response after induction phase and those with persistent tumour underwent salvage cystectomy. We assessed using Kaplan-Meier method overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS), invasive recurrence-free survival (IRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), survival with bladder preserved (SBP), and toxicities. With a Cox model for OS and the Fine Gray method of competing risk for secondary endpoints, we analysed in univariate (u) and multivariate (m) analysis the impact of tumour characteristics and patient profiles: gender, age, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, polypharmacy, and malnutrition. RESULTS: From 1988 to 2017, 85 patients were included. After induction, complete response rate was 83.5%. With a median follow-up of 63 months, 5 year-OS, CSS, IRFS, MFS and SBP were 61.0%, 77.6%, 71%, 82.9%, and 70.2% respectively. A persistent tumour after induction impacted SBP (SHRm 3.61; p = 0.004), CSS (SHRm 3.27; p = 0.023), and MFS (SHRm 3.68; p = 0.018). Late grade 3 urinary and gastrointestinal toxicities were 3.5% and 1.2%. DISCUSSION: We report here the largest series of bladder preservation over 75 years in a curative intent. Outcomes and tolerance in selected older adults compared favourably with surgical series and with CRT studies using classical fractionation.

Optimization of hippocampus sparing during whole brain radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost-tutorial and efficacy of complete directional hippocampal blocking.

PURPOSE: Hippocampus-avoidance whole brain radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (HA-WBRT+SIB) is a complex treatment option for patients with multiple brain metastases, aiming to prevent neurocognitive decline and simultaneously increase tumor control. Achieving efficient hippocampal dose reduction in this context can be challenging. The aim of the current study is to present and analyze the efficacy of complete directional hippocampal blocking in reducing the hippocampal dose during HA-WBRT+SIB. METHODS: A total of 30 patients with multiple metastases having undergone HA-WBRT+SIB were identified. The prescribed dose was 30 Gy in 12 fractions to the whole brain, with 98% of the hippocampus receiving ≤ 9 Gy and 2% ≤ 17 Gy and with SIB to metastases/resection cavities of 36-51 Gy in 12 fractions. Alternative treatment plans were calculated using complete directional hippocampal blocking and compared to conventional plans regarding target coverage, homogeneity, conformity, dose to hippocampi and organs at risk. RESULTS: All alternative plans reached prescription doses. Hippocampal blocking enabled more successful sparing of the hippocampus, with a mean dose of 8.79 ± 0.99 Gy compared to 10.07 ± 0.96 Gy in 12 fractions with the conventional method (p < 0.0001). The mean dose to the whole brain (excluding metastases and hippocampal avoidance region) was 30.52 ± 0.80 Gy with conventional planning and 30.28 ± 0.11 Gy with hippocampal blocking (p = 0.11). Target coverage, conformity and homogeneity indices for whole brain and metastases, as well as doses to organs at risk were similar between planning methods (p > 0.003). CONCLUSION: Complete directional hippocampal blocking is an efficient method for achieving improved hippocampal sparing during HA-WBRT+SIB.

Definitive Chemoradiotherapy with Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil for Advanced Cervical Esophageal Cancer: A Medium-Term Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is widely considered as a treatment option for cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) toward preserving the larynx. We have reported favorable outcomes, including the treatment response rate and short-term survival of dCRT concomitant with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF-RT) for advanced cervical ESCC. The aim of this paper was to report the subsequent progress of the study. METHODS: We assessed 18 patients with advanced (clinical stage II-IV, including T4b and/or M1 lymph node) cervical ESCC at our department who received DCF-RT as the first-line treatment between December 2010 and June 2020. RESULTS: A total of 14 men and 4 women underwent the study regimen. The pretreatment clinical stage included stage II, stage III, stage IVA, and stage IVB cases (including 9 patients with T4b) [8 trachea and 2 thyroids] and 7 patients with the M1 lymph node. The complete response (CR) was achieved in 15 patients, stable disease in 2, and progressive disease in 1. Of 15 patients with CR, 7 experienced recurrence, and 8 had continued CR. Frequent cases of grade ≥3 adverse effects included leucopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and pharyngeal pain. The 3-year overall survival rate, disease-free survival rate, and disease-specific survival rate were 44.2%, 47.7%, and 48.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: DCF-RT for advanced cervical esophageal cancer could achieve a favorable prognosis with larynx preservation. Further observations are warranted to establish the long-term prognosis, late complications of radiotherapy, and the significance of salvage surgery.